..which sounds like there was a clause in the contract exempting this user from negative trust and allowing them to continue in the campaign regardless of what negative trust they get.
-snip-
I guess I can separate the two as a publicly run signature campaign and a privately run signature campaign, but in either case, why would a private advertising deal on this forum include a clause allowing the user to get red trust and still be paid for advertising?
Again, there is
no clause at all let alone one exempting someone from negative trust. Read the actual contract:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3017111.msg31023940#msg31023940.
aTriz and I are going into a 3-year contract for my signature space. The terms are as follows:
- - I will post anywhere from 30 to 100 posts monthly on bitcointalk
- - By the end of the three year term, I will be a Legendary member
- - For the whole term, a signature of his choice will be in my signature space
If any of these terms are not met, aTriz has no obligation to continue payments, and I will refund him the total paid amount.
The total payment amount is 1.1 BTC, locked in at a rate of 12741.75 SGD per coin (9654.30 USD).
The payments will be done in BTC, but BTC will simply act as a payment method - the value will be pegged to the SGD amount, the total being 14015.93 SGD.
A monthly payment of (14015.93/36 = 389.33) SGD will be made (~294 USD, for reference). This will be converted and paid in BTC according to the preev.com BTC to SGD rate on the last day of every month.