Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Can you still believe aTriz words?
by
ibminer
on 28/02/2018, 17:46:18 UTC
Quote from: Quickseller on February 28, 2018, 05:07:37 PM
Quote from: ibminer on February 28, 2018, 04:28:59 PM
Quote from: Lauda on February 28, 2018, 04:05:01 PM
Quote from: Quickseller on February 28, 2018, 04:03:20 PM
Looking at the terms of the contract, I don’t see any reason why aTriz should be able to back out of paying alia.
Other than the amount that was paid upfront, I think the same. Although the input from others is welcome.

I have to assume aTriz is referring to something with his post... but I agree, it seems like the contract, as posted, should not hold aTriz accountable to continue payments. Still not sure why one would agree to a 5 month upfront payment in this situation. Seems like quite a risk for a user with no real prior history who has only been on the forum 1 month.

I am curious to know what in the written contact makes you come to this conclusion. The only way I see aTriz getting out of the contract is if alia doesn’t make at least 30 posts per month.

I don't think he's obligated to pay. He entered into the contract thinking someone was who they said they were and that person is clearly a liar who is misrepresenting themselves, so IMO the contract could be void just based on the fact it was created under false pretenses. I'd also add that standard public policies amongst the community has generally been that red trust == removal from signature campaigns which I believe adds further reasoning.