Three letters. WOW. I had to let it sink first. I did not think a post could change my mind about another person (aTriz), but your post did it. Your post is a perfect example of how to argue conclusively and calmly. After reading your post I feel bad about having brought a very likely innocent person (aTriz) in connection with a scammer (alia) or accusing aTriz to be involved in the scam. I still believe that his actions should have consequences, but no longer think he should be painted red. That would be too harsh a punishment for which he most likely just naive acted. You have just climbed a level in my personal trust level (nullius).
I am very sorry aTriz. I acted too fast and thoughtless.
I am very sorry aTriz. I acted too fast and thoughtless.
Thank you, scam_detector. I think that when aTriz arrives, all this can be settled amicably some way which reasonably assures that the thing you complain of will not happen again. I think thats what youre seeking; am I right?
Aside, it was from your behaviour in the other thread that I concluded that your intentions are what you claim: Fighting scamswhile not risking flamewar blowback to your main account, but also not taking credit as the one who outed Alia. I see that I was correct in this assessment.
For all the people discussing that signature contract:
In the Alia scam thread, I raised the issue of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Rather than digging up what few words I already said on the topic, or trying to write new oneshere, have a wiki link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_covenant_of_good_faith_and_fair_dealing
TL;DR: Terms such as you must not be a scammer totally misrepresenting your identity to obain this contract do not need to be written into a contract. They are implicit in all contracts; and breach thereof is material breach of the contract.
Ignorance at best
It is foolish to trust scripts
Luck is unchanging
It is foolish to trust scripts
Luck is unchanging
Thank you. That wasnot only witty, but quite instructive, I think.
Out of the last 24 posts, 16 were personal alia/nullius recriminations, and her/his/its other recent responses were just abuse or drivel.
At least mine were wittyand true.
It was an unpleasant surprise to see someone who appeared to be level headed like aTriz, making the errors of judgement he has made in vouching for a gambling script and pre paying a large signature deal with a newbie, based on a 'contract' apparently scribbled on the back of an envelope.
My best guess: Star power. Movie studio exec rushes to lock in a hot rising starlet, who is supposed to be the Next Big Thingand it turns out, there is some nasty surprise about her...
Again, my guess.
I note that aTriz also hinted at making an offer for my signature. From Alias signature-selling thread:
Do we get the sig space of your alt nullius as well? 
(Disclosure: Some discussions were had. The only reason why Im not wearing a paid signature now is that I really dont want onealthough I do not wholly exclude the possibility; remember, Im the guy who couldnt get scammed out of 1.2 BTC because I dont have it. Nevertheless, my PGP key fingerprints need the space. PGP fingerprints are important to me.)
@OP i am not sure, but maybe aTriz was thinking with his dick 
Though I was not privy to any discussions between them whatsoever, I doubt that. I suspect that aTriz was simply interested in snapping up her signature and, he hoped, mine also.
Quote from: Signature
Attention. I am a scammer. Please do not trade with me.
Good idea. (Suddenly, the prepayment money becomes a public service.)
$300 a month isn't a lot for someone who was already on Theymos's watch list and who had convinced theymos to change her forum name.
My bad. Oops.