As for the gambling vouch, didn't he just say that it worked?
Did he check script for backdoors?
That would imply that he knows more than what a variable initialization looks like. To my knowledge, he does not.
That wasn't really a question.
Look, I am strongly against people who are selling "winning scripts" or any kind of gambling scripts/bots for several reasons:
1) gambling scripts/bots are available for free, no one needs to buy one
2) winning script/method doesn't exist, people who are selling such methods are selling fog to naive people
3) such scripts/bots usually have something hidden to steal balance
As I already said, he was probably thinking with his lower head and I hope all this will remind him not to vouch for such shady thing again.
~
However I remember that she said her ''strategy'' was based on a vulnerability on a particular casino because the casino itself had some sort of script that would let new accounts win at first or something like that. It wasn't really a normal idiotic ''strategy'' at least that's what she said. I personally wouldn't vouch for something like that even if it was legit since it involves some sort of cheating.
You are wrong, For this case and method, she specifically said that script was created for provably fair sites:
This script is designed for crash sites, and has been backtested against around 2 years worth of data. This script is intended for use on provably fair sites
"Method" you mentioned was posted in other topic.