Lovely nice peaceful people.
lol, yep. It's a regular diplomats brunch here.
Oh well, haters gona hate. non-haters gona build the future.
The ignorant attacks over hamsters, Jews, etc. are very encouraging. Attacks like this are the final bastions of those with no ideas and not enough knowledge to participate in a real process. These sorts of things can be ignored because they represent nothing but an inability to understand the complexity of being a board member.
This is what I mean. Nobody can explain why they support her. They either repeat the Motherhood statements or divert attention to referencing the idiot posts. The fact that people posted an offensive post doesn't say anything about why someone should or should not vote for her. I don't think is especially bad or wrong and I don't "hate" her, I just don't see why she would be picked once you compare the qualifications and statements of all the candidates. Since nobody can really articulate that it makes me suspicious given some the weird things that go on at that Foundation.
As mentioned before, I've explained my personal support of her multiple times. It's because I know her and believe she will represent the interests of a neutral and independent Bitcoin protocol. She has experience in Washington enough to know how things work and who really gets things done, but was not co-opted by the culture. She is focused on expanding the Bitcoin Foundation as an organization of principles that leads by example rather than the US being a "primary" chapter with "subsidiary" chapters around the world. She has the time to do it, she is incredibly passionate about the topic and works as hard as I do.
If you've been on a board before you know that some people sit on a board, and some people serve. Elizabeth has the time, drive and talent to serve.
This is not to say other candidates aren't qualified, I just think given the position, requirements, and current board makeup I think the Foundation would benefit more from Elizabeth's membership than others.