Very strange thread, why is Trace Mayer taking such a laboured approach to informing us that Roger Ver supports his candidacy? Can Trace Mayer answer?

As an aside, I do not understand why you persist in referring to yourself in the third person. I am also mildly confused at your commentary regarding pleadings for a judge.
Mainly
to make it easier for those not following the conversation to get a grasp on the facts.
Unlike the rest of your opaque and meandering prose?
No it's not. I'm not even going to give such a preposterous proposition the credence of arguing against it, suffice to say; no it's not.
2. I think developing the core protocol to be incredibly robust and tangential code and services around it which greatly increase the level of protection individuals can secure for the lowest cost possible.
This sentence is too vague to be meaningful. I could go on with this critique, but it looks like a lot of work, you've gone into all-out politician mode.
I would be concerned if this kind of candidate can actually appeal to foundation members with this sort of rhetoric, he sounds like he prepared for this campaign with Aristotle "...on Tyranny", Machiavelli's "The Prince" and an ounce of cocaine.