My word against math? nullius used the figure "100%" many times in his post, but never ONCE in my thread did I guarantee success. I said that it is EV-, and its success is purely based on anecdotal and empirical evidence.
That's not what happened. You backpedaled a little bit after making demonstrably false claims such as this:
Based on preceding games, the script can indicate (to a mathematical extent) what kind of games are about to come consequently.
Your best bet (pun intended) now would be to shut your trap and try to salvage your deal with aTriz instead of trying to prove you're not a scammer. That train has sailed.
I said it can
indicate. I have explained this many, many, many times. Just go through my old posts. And I have no need to salvage a deal which is already intact.
That's still false and I did read your posts - aside from variations of the gambler's fallacy there is nothing there.
aTriz does not seem to be happy with the deal anymore. He could choose to end it and risk the consequences, which might be negligible for him if you continue acting in bad faith.
I do not think it is justifiable for the contract to be broken because no terms have been breached. aTriz can clarify this. The payments are supposed to be made to me, and not an escrow - aTriz can clarify this. But - due to the new circumstances, I will allow one concession. I will allow payments to be made to a Copay wallet (with one key controlled by me and one with aTriz). It will be setup such that coins can only be moved with the consent of me and aTriz. If, at the end of the 3 year term, I have made enough posts and am Legendary, then aTriz will transfer the coins into my wallet. If it has not been done, I'll refund the 5 months' payment along with everything in the Copay wallet.
This doesn't make it any less risky for aTriz.