I disabled fee in Claymore. Lost 1Mh/s on each gpu.
So it' s worth to pay the fee.
how come 1% is more than 1Mh/s ? what is wrong with you?
Can't you count? The 1MH/s loss scales too. That is, let's say he has 1k GPUs, at 31MH/s per:
With the fee on, his "effective" hashrate is 31 * 1000 * 0.99 = 30,690MH/s.
With the nofee switch and the inability to modify the code to disable the slowdown: 30 * 1000 = 30,000MH/s.
Pretty clear to me.
oh yeah sorry, I misread the message.
YES, my point was paying fee is better.
What a drama coming!
For those who wants Claymore to lower dev fee - suck it up dudes, he makes constant developments of miner things and he's the only one who always deliver.
If you are so greedy and for you 0.35% makes a huge difference (sick joke, seriously), it would be better to throw yourselves out of the window.
I am 100% sure those who have industrial mines have their own miner software and not have any problem with comission.
So, most of baby cryers outta here have 1 rig with 300$ monthly income -- 3$ per month for actually MAKING this income possible -- it is too much for you guys?
Coming back to reverse engineering thing, I do not appreciate such kind of actions. Hope it has nothing with stealing Claymore's code.
Have a nice day everyone!
I have significant hashpower and believe me, 0.35% makes a substantial difference at current prices
it is your problem you cannot inquire someone about your private miner and have a stable hashrate with no fees.
you misunderstand me - 0.35% is the difference between Phoenix Miner and Claymore - that difference IS significant