I just came back here on BTT after almost 2 months now and came to this topic.
it is clear Lauda(aka The Pharmacist aka dillpicklechips)
Funny.
And I came across this
thread. I don't mind TBZ to be putting up neutral trust to those who violated his auction terms but (as what mentioned in that thread) it came across me that it is too personal.
I've also read the neutral feedback he gave to EcuaMobi and he is a bit delusional in assuming that those who broke his auction terms are scammers who are pretending to be illiterate or whatsoever.
As I said in the OP, this auction thread is very confusing (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2661337.msg27133270#msg27133270). I think the question I asked back there made sense than selling all those XRPs for JUST a dollar. He even realized it that's why he locked down the thread and made another one (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2664660.msg27177764#msg27177764) with a much higher starting auction price.
Overall, I feel glad that someone had stand up and pointed out this trust abuse. He doesn't understand the weight of his feedbacks and can't judge accordingly to be fit in DT. As TBZ said, it is more than liability or neutrality than an asset
to him.
It is time to give it to someone who can understand very well that being a DT means not being an asset to you only but rather as an asset to the forum and the community. DT is not for your personal drive but for the common good. In TBZ's case, it is more like most part of it is personal than for the common good of the forum and the community.