Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] All new, redefined zhash.pro [SNG, ZEN, HUSH, BTCP soon]
by
HashRaptor
on 02/03/2018, 00:58:00 UTC
Agreed.  I like the features of ZHash much better than SuprNova.  However, the recent results aren't making sense.  Will move over to SuprNova and compare.  The payout system there seems to make sense.  Hopefully, I'll be able to use this pool again soon.

Hello, what's wrong, network increased to 50-60 msol, difficulty too, we don't have 10% of network as is was before when we had 2-2.5 msol and network was 30 avg, now we have 3 msol and network is 55-60 msol, plus some pool throw from Nicehash 5-20 msol, network is unstabe, sometimes there is no blocks in network within 30 minutes

No, that is only *part* of the problem; the part you didn't mention is that your PPLNS settings might need adjusting if your pool no longer finds blocks at the same rate it used to.

EDIT - I'm also seeing about 50% of what I should be getting based on my hashrate and average difficulty over the last 24 hours.
PPLNT (we don't use PPLNS) is all the same as on old infarstucture, anyway thanks we will check it once again, my payouts from 3.2 ksol a -20-40% lower WTM, i see onther pools have problems too,

Tomorrow when BTCP will be launched lots of miners will go there, and pool hoppers with Nicehash too, and Zen network will calm and it will be ok i guess, close to be sure on it


PPLNT is even worse than PPLNS if the time to find each block varies a lot, so that's not a correction that does you any favors.

However, I appreciate the response and the willingness to look into this. I had a very good experience with your pool prior to the server upgrade, but ever since then my results have been far more spotty; for now I am attributing that to technical reasons (e.g. - PPLNT settings) rather than malice.