Anyone who asks me to use it with a larger amount is stupid.
1) ROI is ROI. Whether it's on 1 bit or 1 bitcoin the return percentage is the same.
2) Since the script fails 9/10 times, I don't want to lose my coin. I will never use the script on significant amounts of money, unless it's for investors
I have. Risk is also told to investors. There is a chance of losses. That is why I don't use it on personal funds too much. Luckily, no investor has lost money so far (and no more will because I am no longer using the script commercially)
investors = stupid. Did you disclose to them that theyre stupid?
You offered to me that I could invest a
minimum of 1.2 BTC. You did not disclose to me that I would be stupid to invest 1.2+ BTC.
I was referring to my test run. They are not stupid for playing with 1.2 BTC. They are stupid for suggesting that whether I play with 1 bit or 1 bitcoin makes a difference to the ROI. Do you get it?
Ok, please explain this to me like Im stupid.
Whats different about the test run? Does the test run script fail 9/10 times, whereas the
real script you saved for investors only fails 8.99/10 times? Do you have two scripts, the test run script which is stupid to use for large amounts and should only be judged on ROI, and the
real script which is fine to use for 1.2+ BTC?
The logic here is getting so convoluted that I have trouble arguing against it. Its not even wrong.
Edit: I see what youre claiming here: That people asking you why you dont just
make yourself rich with the script are somehow stupid for asking the obvious question.
Better question, which you have not addressed: Did you ever disclose to investors that
the script fails 9/10 times? You did not disclose that to me, when you offered that I could invest a minimum of 1.2 BTC.
Obvious note: A
90% failure rate is very different from, Risk is also told to investors. There is a chance of losses..