Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread
by
kslaughter
on 12/09/2013, 21:12:52 UTC
If the CEO is buying shares by insider trading isn't that great news?  Huh

Yes, and he even disclosed it, which I'm sure is rare in Bitcoin land. The things people latch onto... it has to be for dramatic effect.

he withheld information on the avalon refund & used that to purchase cheap shares. this isn't drama - its either an idiot or someone who is scamming his shareholders.

Fine, you have apologized, now are you going to withdraw this statement TMAN, or are you going to stand by it? Answer please.



I will if ken can confirm what the below statement means.. I take it as he has purchased on 2 accounts..

As a matter of fact, I have purchase a number of shares on the open market.  I am also purchasing shares how for my own account.  We will be releasing P&L for this quarter by the end of October.

If I am wrong I will retract my words 100% I'm not here to cause agro and I haven't traded a single active share since last month



With respect Ken doesn't need to answer that.

Legally an apology isn't enough to resolve this, an apology does not impact on the original accusation.

You need to withdraw the statement, withdraw the accusation, admitting it was incorrect or you will by implication stand by it. I think you need to be aware your statements go beyond the usually FUD on here and make specific accusations of illegal activity and as such would be considered attempts to damage the reputation of the company and its CEO.


With respect to you, please read what I wrote above, ken indicated he is trading on 2 accounts. If 1 is a company account where did the funds come from and why wasnt the buyback announced. Answer that ken and if I am wrong I will retract what I have said. 

In the above statement, I was speaking about myself, as I have purchase shares on the open market for myself, and  I am also [going to] purchase shares for my own account.  The first statement was in the past and the second statement was in the present all on the same account.