If this is not math to you, then I feel very sorry for you (for being you) and for myself for having to read through your nonsense.
It is math, but it's bad math. Here's why:
What about 100 times? The odds of getting 20% ROI 100 times is (82.5%)^100 = 4.419721e-7%, astronomically small. And yet, with my script, you will see it happen before your eyes. I won't post here every day, but for the next 100 days, 9/10 times (or more), you will see a 20% ROI on the initial bet. And please don't reply here with some bullshit, just wait for the proof before crying "but muh math" because your math does not apply to my script. It applies to what you know but not to what I have done.
Firstly, the odds of getting 90/100 are
several orders of magnitude higher than the odds of getting 100/100. You can't claim you will see odds of 4.4197e-7 "happen before your eyes", and then immediately change the criteria in the next sentence. Also, this is now the third time you've changed the criteria, from 18/20, to 9/10 and now to 90/100. These give vastly different p values, and therefore vastly different degrees of "proof".
Secondly, I'm sorry but the phrase "before crying "but muh math" because your math does not apply to
my script." is laughable. Either maths
is applicable to your script (and therefore, as we've shown, your script is a scam) or you've written a script which breaks the
fundamental laws of mathematics, in which case you are sitting on Nobel Prize material.