Look at the difference between bitfury and KnC. Bitfury has better power efficiency, even though they're 55nm and KnC is 28nm. The difference is bitfury is a 'full custom' ASIC while KnC is a standard-cell design.
Interesting.
That reinforces what I was complaining about from the start: InactiveMining's shareholders still stop any thinking at "28 nm".
Here's the thing, they are going to have chips eventually, but they won't be profitable enough and no one will want them.
And I'm not saying that because I want your "cheap shares".So looking for betters is even less respectable than trying to scoop up cheap shares. Obviously if Ken was able to price his product competively then his cost to produce them is competitive as well.