Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)
We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.
Do you still confirm that these two pictures represent reality?Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.
If so, please explain how the number of pins is different (128 vs 44) between the design and the boards/tray. You may also explain how the "giggahashes" send the results to the internet through the resistor/capacitor pin (which seems to be the only one thing connectable on the board). Or perhaps you might think this board filled with hardware and software enthusiasts is full of morons that can't figure out you are technically unequipped to deliver your promise?
[/quote
Again... im no technician... what pins do you mean? The chip pins and the one on the board match. And the pcb doesnt look like they plan to connect a lan-cable on it. It would be stupid to try in the large plans they have. They only use the pcb for hashing and all the other work is outsourced to another part of the miner. So that they only have to plug in a miner card to enhance hashrate. At least thats how the pcb look to me.
What experience do you have in hardware?
And yes it might be that the other side is more interesting, i really dont know how many parts HAS to be on THAT pcb. I mean theoretically the only things such a pcb has to have would be pins for the chips, vias (only if the heat has to be taken away through the pcb and not from the top of the chip) and connections to the chips. Everything else could be located on a secondary pcb that connects to the actual miner pcb's. And that part takes over all the parts that are needed to be built directly on the bitburner boards. Because those boards are designed to run as one single pcb with heatsink. I wouldnt design a miner that has to run in a farm the same way. I would do it more like avalons work. Many small pcb with chips and other pcb's that handle all the small pcb's with miner chips.
I dont have a clue how these chips have to be cooled. Watercooling maybe? Maybe thats the problem they have at the moment...
*lol* Are you real guys? You write over 70 pages in the last couple of hours only because theswede states that the hashrate of 2TH is not as stable that they will publicly show it? And you crash the price because of that?
The price crashed because they claim to have 2TH but all they can show us are unfinished boards and loose chips.
I noticed that. And they claimed its unstable and nothing worth to show yet. I dont see why the reaction on that has to be so drastically. At the end show me one ASIC-Producer that had their asic running perfectly at the date they wanted to have it?