There was a social contract. The IntenseCoin team offered coins in exchange for social media followers. The users fulfilled their part of the contract and the IntenseTeam gained a substantial amount of followers on the various social platforms. Now it is time for the IntenseCoin team to fulfil their part of the contract and supply the airdrop amount to the remaining users.

A mistake can happen, but refusing to fix the mistake and putting the blame on hundreds of users can't be the solution. That puts the project in a very bad light, IMHO. There's already a lot of people complaining here for various other reasons (if those are justified or not). It should be in the IntenseCoin team's best interest to prove those doubters wrong. Withholding airdrop payouts to users who did nothing wrong doesn't do that. How are investors supposed to gain trust in the project when airdrop participants get denied their fair share?

What the IntenseCoin team should/must do now:

• reverify the accounts with "wrong" slack user name comparing to the correct user name list (the one that shows the public "display names"!)
• recalculate the airdrop share basing on the total number of qualifying users
• pay the remaining and qualifying users their share

Yes, it sucks for the team that it must share some more of their own fund to rectify this issue. Yes, those remaining participants get a smaller share than those who already got their share. Yes, those who already got their share were lucky and got more than they should have.

I was very lucky, it seems, while I also provided a Slack user name (not a Discord one) it was luckily the same as my email user name part, so I got my (too big) share. I was only expecting around 1000 ITNS... so I was somewhat surprised about the substantial larger amount I got. Not that I did mind.