I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.
Here's their youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)
We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.
which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it
That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.
But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.
Yep, I also would be carful about video reviews. A lot of youtuber promising much but just telling you stuff which is written in the whitepaper or on the website anyways. There are too many selfproclaimed experts out there, hard to find really good ones (still there are some good channels out there, but these are always telling you anyways to research on your own too).