Yes, really shxtty stuff, there are other issues like
https://github.com/BTCPrivate/BitcoinPrivate/issues/124More funny in
https://github.com/BTCPrivate/bitcoin-private-full-node-wallet/issues/32 is:
"balances from fork need to be sent in full to a Z address before being able to be spent normally.
provide more user-friendly error message when attempted."
I have some hard time to believe it, why? requirement of their wallet only? save some time before it is sent to an exchange? Then please someone try my tool, there are no reasons why you should send your coins to a z-address first
PS: and indeed we can't trust their explorer, whether down, not showing the utxos before the fork when up or strange info (intentional?)
This is how Z coins work. You have to put freshly mined coins to Z address before you can transfer them. You are promoting your tool just because you want that 1.5% fee from people using it. Official wallet can be trusted there is no doubt about that. If you don't trust the developers, why would you want coin they created?
Apparently you are affiliated to the BTCP team to promote (agressively) things (again, please stop), I don't care of the 1.5%, neither of this coin, the tool is just an alternative for people not to be fxcked by rules they did not decide and manage things by themselves, just curious about what is going on here, the wallet is a piece of shxt, the explorer the same, read again my article on the subject and you will find quite a lot of similarities
This is how Z coins work. You have to put freshly mined coins to Z address before you can transfer them.
Yes, but that's not what we are talking about here, we are talking about transferring coins from before the fork to after the fork, or from after to after, but not about reward coins
Is it safe now to get BTCP from bitcoin addresses? Which wallet should one use to accomplish this?
Wonder what the market cap will be when it lists for trading.. perhaps many exchanges will support this on launch like BTCG