You know, I think I fundamentally confused "services" as it was intended for thread taxonomy. I thought it meant "this is where you post to talk about blockchain that will perform a service". Even then it might not be the best fit. What I now understand is that it's for posting about offering services (marketing, Dev, etc,). I'd be happy to take it down if it's truly miscategorized.

As for the contradiction. I'm not sure that's how I'd categorize what you're describing. But let me give you some subtext here. I was sort of approaching it like how Stephen Colbert would interview the author of a book he enjoyed. Warm introduction with some background and that sort of thing.

Also, the 'full disclosure" part wasn't actually for the point of distancing myself from the project but rather merely stating that I'm not associated with the project directly. As opposed to someone who works for them for example. This sort of thing is fairly Common Place and it's for the sake of transparency, as opposed to hedging my words.

Had I been a large token holder for example I would have said that, or if they were a client of mine or something, I would have said that. Again I was just going for transparency.

I hear what you're saying and maybe my tone was a little too praiseworthy, but it was my honest opinion and I can stand behind that. Many of the projects I see in blockchain are not very interesting to me at all but these guys were an exception.

I hope that makes what I was trying to communicate a little clearer but I appreciate you mentioning it because that'll only help me be a better part of the bitcointalk community. Cheers!