There's nothing against being arrogant, though it would obviously be bad practice and campaign managers should have patience but so should participants on the campaign but it's hard to judge without hearing the full story, but this manager should probably be looked into. There's lots of scammers and incompetent people getting jobs as campaign managers right now and if you look at his feedback it's alleged he has a few alts that seem to engage in shady behaviour:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981 hua_hui
hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:
Which is against his own campaign terms:
How many other alt accounts has he possibly given places to? Did they make the required posts etc?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981 hua_hui
hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:
Which is against his own campaign terms:
Rules:
- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.
- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.
How many other alt accounts has he possibly given places to? Did they make the required posts etc?