Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN

I barely met the minimum requirements and I got 4400 ITNS on the airdrop.

Sometimes people screw up and they simply can't admit it and go rage the internetz...

Well, indeed I agree with you. The IntenseCoin team screwed up and they can not admit this.

According to Slack support team, the usernames have been replaced by the display names. This has happened since September 2017 and those who have signed up in Slack after that date do not have any Slack username but they have a Slack display name (which is what was formerly known as username). I can provide evidence about it. Officially coming from Slack.

The IntenseCoin team have disqualified a lot of people since they do not accept this official principal!! Cheesy

They believe that the username in Slack is something different. According to the IntenseCoin team, my Slack username was my email ID (the email that Iused to sign up in Slack). This is totally incorrect. Therefore, I inserted the correct information in the form but the team disqualified me (and many others) since they believe that the username is something different (which is not!).

I don't know if they took this action by scope or not however the way they have handled all this and the ignorance they have shown is very bad and shows much of unseriousness.

If you still do not understand what I am saying, I am sorry. I have also contacted the Slack support team and I know very well the story inside-out and I do not care about the coins. But my IQ has falled down to zero with the excuses I hear from these people.

And that´s the answer I wanted to hear from devs! Thanks a lot for your effort and explanation. This search should for sure ITNS team did and not you. I gave up my fight because I don´t like to repeat same things again and again if there is zero chance to get real answer. Shame on me that I gave up Cheesy

I think they didn´t want to tell the truth because they screwed up it with SLACK and a they also screwed up rewards. Correct me if I am wrong please, because I really don´t remember it precisely but didn´t they say 1000 for everyone who will meet the conditions in airdrop? So why they sent higher amounts to people who met the conditions? Yes, It is nice from them and they have 2/3 of happy airdropers but it was not necessary and they would have now coins for people with SLACK problem. Problem would be solved as fast as arised and everybody would be happy. People would get their coins, bitcointalk would be full of positive messages how great devs are because they solved it and devs would save some coins for future.

So devs are in trouble now I guess. They don´t have coins which were intended for airdrop and they don´t want to send their own coins.

But after all my messages I would say they will just ignore it or ThePigwee will say something what will look like the answer. It will be not real answer but someone will say to you just shut up we do not want to listen it anymore . Case is closed Cheesy

The payment amount was the second mistake that they did. They said they will distribute 1 million up to 1,000 participants and 2.50 million coins if participants were higher than 1,000 and up to 2,500. So what they did? Total participants were 1227, from them the team says that the 53% were invalid participants and the valid were 565. However, they pay the amount basis 1227 participants. They brought a total mess in a simple airdrop and can not see what was the scope out of it.

Just so you have a better understanding, up to 1000 participants means the number of people that entered is less than or equal to 1000. Greater than 1000 participants bumps the payout amount. Participants =/= valid submissions.

Now I can say I remeber this rule you had when you said it(I said I was no sure). So okey, you followed what you said in this case but it does not change that you screwed up the first part and you are still not able to admit it which is funny Cheesy