Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Credits(CRDS): CPU-only mining | Argon2d PoW - Masternodes
by
NetZero
on 06/03/2018, 23:57:16 UTC
Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap.  Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.
This is crucial. Now there are confusion between old and new credits fork as well as confusion between credits coin and credits token.
The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l

I agree with this as well however I believe some publicity on this could balance things out. Ah heck maybe changing the name and re-announcing might be for the best.  
I was looking at the signatures on the bounties thread and saw the incorrect websites linked.  Just seems like quite a bit of confusion with CRDS.
Maybe just change the name and keep the logo and designs?