Re: Joe's Signatureless Challenge: Win $25 ($10 for 2nd) + 8 Merits every week!
BitcoinTalk Username: purple.thoughts
Starting Post Count (including this one): 67
Current Rank: jr. member
BTC Address: 38mQRiQkzbvYwVet6cdn1DUbHjc1zeZxZS
This is a good thing because it encourages not only spammers but all those who really want to post quality posts.
Starting Post Count (including this one): 67
Current Rank: jr. member
BTC Address: 38mQRiQkzbvYwVet6cdn1DUbHjc1zeZxZS
This is a good thing because it encourages not only spammers but all those who really want to post quality posts.
One, you're wearing a signature so you're disqualified
Two, the campaign is currently closed for this week
@BTCforJoe, I suggest adding an explicit written rule disqualifying people who make a patent demonstration of having failed to read the rules. The length of disqualification should be proportional to how outrageously the rules were ignored. In any case where its obvious that a bounty-grubber is blindly groping for a place to drop a username and Bitcoin address, disqualification may as well be permanent.
The delightful irony is that those who fail to read the rules will miss this rule, too.
That gets from me a rare emoticon: :-(
A Wild Gleb Gamow Appears
;-)