I don't give a shit.
If you are comfortable blowing someone's spot based on the traces they've left on the web, that's up to you. It's up to the individual to operate in a manner that allows for them to be private. If he's left footprints and if you feel comfortable releasing his real name... I don't care. But I don't see how that is of benefit as we can at least confront jbg by his screen-name and we are not afforded that same benefit of confrontation with your... I dunno... informant.
But I thought your original post was unbiased and informative. It had a feel of genuinely pointing out concerns. This most recent post has some passive aggression and presumptions about what makes a "genuine person" in the form of an ultimatum and a lot of very speculative input. The tone has changed.
I love to troll, it's a simple pleasure in my life and a horrible indictment of my character. Your first post was a REALLY good example of how I would present something if I wanted to look distanced and like I was genuinely trying to help (but I was actually baiting someone)... but this most recent post is starting to reek of something more personal. Like the bait wasn't substantial so you're "upping" your game . Throwing subtle jabs here trying to goad someone into an emotional reaction... which we both know would result in you "winning" from a troll perspective.
The other guy (Preshprince)'s post started in that manner. Making claims without proof and such. I peeped that game from the get go. But now you're starting to head in that direction.
So why do all this? You said your piece initially, which informed the people. They can make their decisions from that first post and decide whether JBG is genuine or not yeah? You're attempting to set the precedent for what is and isn't acceptable now. You aren't just providing your "findings" you're challenging character. You're questioning semantics. You're hiding sources. These are also questionable actions.
Edit: Didn't nail preshprince's screen name. Edited