I understand your comment and you are right, I have changed my tone. But for a reason.
If more than a month ago I was doubtful, after a month of looking of what's going on in XSPEC, my doubts are becoming more and more certainty. I have written why endless times. Also the change of tone was intended to make jbg reply.
Think about it from my perspective:
you lose a lot of time to share your research to the community for 0 return and you mostly get quick shill answers which you have to spend more time answering to. Then the guy doesn't even answer to you. After a month, the market says I am right, and then he of course answers. Not because he wants to, because the market says so.
Also I then ask him for very simple things to clear everything up, and after more than a month they are still not done!
How do you want me to approach a, what now I believe is, potential scammer? Do you want me to go gentle with him?
Like: hey, so sorry you missed your own set up deadline to release 1.4, and you still don't know when you are going to release it. You also haven't made 1.4 code public after a month, how many more months do you want? 2 or 3? Let's do 4!
Do you think this would work better?
I don't approve much preshprince tone, he's way harsher than me and has spent less time researching XSPEC in general than me, but hey, his choice.
You asked for screenshots, I gave them to you. I am not lying as you can see. You can think I am not genuine, but to be honest I don't care anymore. I only care about jbg responses and his ability of release 9 months worth of development work with 1.4. This hasn't happened yet, and it's the only thing everyone should care about. Plus maybe his donation address transactions, which is worrying too.
I see what you are saying, but again it is my perception that you are attempting to dictate the terms and conditions of what is "acceptable" as far as a response goes and though I may misremembering your earlier post it feels as if the goals posts are being moved with each response. On top of that I don't understand why you feel as if it's the responsibility of jbg to respond to you. You feel under appreciated for the work that you did to investigate this issue so you begin implementing snark to "get a response." I understand that you may not find the intrinsic motivation of having done something positive for the crypto community enough to sate you for the work that you did, but posts like the previous one question whether this was for the good of the crypto community or not. If you are not invested and have a genuine interest in fleshing out the concerns with jbg... then why the violent communication technique?
When I go back and look at your earlier post where you suggested times by which a project should be completed and see that the authority with which you presented your information may be flawed, incomplete, or both I find myself questioning what you used as a benchmark and whether or not any of the code based arguments were of any merit. Because the things you are claiming should take a very short time (If I'm understanding correctly) can be quite a hefty task.
Also that "Should I post jbg's real name and location" statement makes me think you wish to use that as some sort of leverage. As if you're hanging this over the community's head or something. I don't understand the intention there either.
I thank you for posting the pics instead of using them in a threatening fashion. If we are here to call people out then there's no reason for the "I got a gun in my pocket" talk... just shoot. It showed me that you weren't being ENTIRELY genuine about the information you were claiming to present. But I still think you're generally being genuine. Sometimes people stretch the validity of things to prove a point and you came clean, so I'm cool with that. But I am still not sure why you are choosing to hide the screen name of the individual that claimed jbg said he had 25 years of experience coding. That's a pretty damning claim. I'd like to see evidence of this and if someone is willing to say that shouldn't they weigh in here with some evidence. Turn something that is just hearsay into something a bit more tangible?