(Cutting short a
long reply I was about to post.)
has = hex: e9474064aaeb4d07689d80952adb4d785d318fcd43947b90ec25c12450876f50. I'm not sure if I got it correct or not, I used just found one on the web.
Thank you, aTriz.
I suggest at this juncture to move discussion of the script and its disposition over to the
Alia scam thread. Insofar as I am concerned, aTriz has committed himself to a hashand that adequately settles the aTriz part of this question, for the reasons I already stated:
For the record: I find aTriz to be highly credible when he states that he has a script, and does not reveal it due to extortionate threat of doxing.
If he publicly commits a SHA-256 hash, that would also much bolster the credibility of this statement insofar as he would instantly destroy his whole reputation in one blow, if future circumstance proved him unable to produce a matching script. No intelligent person in aTrizs position would potentially seal his own future doom by posting a fake hash. Key word: Commitment. This implication of a hash commitment is well-known to everybody who knows anything about cryptographyand aTriz should be guided accordingly.
I urge everybody to be level-headed, and remember that we are potentially playing with somebodys life here. Not knowing aTrizs private circumstance, it is impossible to guess what his life is like, or what unjust negative consequences he could suffer from having his dox released by a criminal.
Edit: To be clear: Above, I speak only of the question of aTriz possessing a gambling script as alleged. Hed be a terrible fool to make such a commitment if he had no such script. A few other questions remain here, including one I stated above; however, I believe the script existence/possession was the biggest one.
The easiest way would be to publish the script here so it can be verified by experienced users. So I ask aTriz to publish the script here.
@scam_detector, would it be satisfactory to you as a first step if aTriz were to commit a SHA-256 hash of any pertinent script in his possession? I think that would then allow any further discussions to proceed more smoothly.
@aTriz, I suggest committing a SHA-256 hash of the script. That is what I would do at this point, if I were in your positionto fix the bit-for-bit identity of the script for evidentiary purposes, as well as to immediately show that I am acting in good faith in the face of many accusations.
Note: I have previously (somewhere in the prove my script works thread) suggested that Alia commit such a hash. Of course, it did not happen.