I obtained the exact same results from the same tool, copypasting in the script with
no trailing newline:
https://www.online-convert.com/result/b805a0a1-0f53-4afc-9a4e-c197e94764d6Your hash has been successfully generated.
hex: e9474064aaeb4d07689d80952adb4d785d318fcd43947b90ec25c12450876f50
HEX: E9474064AAEB4D07689D80952ADB4D785D318FCD43947B90EC25C12450876F50
h:e:x: e9:47:40:64:aa:eb:4d:07:68:9d:80:95:2a:db:4d:78:5d:31:8f:cd:43:94:7b:90:ec:25:c1:24:50:87:6f:50
base64: 6UdAZKrrTQdonYCVKttNeF0xj81DlHuQ7CXBJFCHb1A=
Whereas feeding (what should be) the identical preimage to Linux (GNU) sha256sum gives:
1e2a57fd0debc229f3984e625e7ea089311e779a47e3d54cf8829458190e71d2
The only difference with this is the final newlineI told you, a 1-character difference will change the whole hash:
With a single '\n' on the last line, and '\n' as newline, I get sha256sum:
5d26e16eda33e8e0637bc86d0a408b7ae42f52259b346b8c142f1bee271b0fa9
(I doubt its significant as to evidence, since aTriz posted the script right on the heels of the hash; but I seek to be correct, and figure out what happened here.)
I at least expect for the Wizard of Oz to have some frighteningly impressive-looking deceptive contraption behind the curtain.
I expected there to be some... you know... CODE. For auditing and shit.
I expected there to be some... you know... MAGIC. Better than mathematical mumbo jumbo.
currentBet *= config.loss.options.increase.value
LOL.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
How big is your bankroll?
How many investors does Alia have?