Can't fault what gunner is saying here.
The word promise may be strong, but let's look at it like this,
As a project that holds investors, if you say something is coming on a date, it is an expectation, asking the question is not a demand, saying he's failed to meet his own words is not a demand, outside of crypto if you were invested in a project and the developer told you something is coming on a date, you would expect this to be true, if he fails you'll want to see proof or reason as to why he has failed.
So in this scenario, he has made claims about the the release of 1.4, he's failed to meet these claims so now gunner is asking him to put up the work done to prove work is actually being done.
To give an example, if I invested in a developer who was building a block of units, he said the foundation would be set by a given date and this failed to happen due to say an issue with a builder, the investor would ask for evidence of this, and also ask for evidence of what's being done to resolve.
Without any evidence the investor would typically pull out of threaten to do so first.
How is this any different? people are investing in to this coin and he's not doing his part as the developer.
The proof is there in the screenshot, and we can see how people react to false deadlines just by looking at the price of XSPEC.
Aside from his communications with gunner, he's also told the entire community that it would be here in Feb.
Can I just give you some advice also, you care about this coin, you dislike people seeing this thread, if you're going to keep bumping it up you have to do better than this, all you're doing is giving it more visibility while being constantly beat in your comments, you are hurting the 1 thing you're trying to save
Good work gunner, keep it up mate
The word promise may be strong, but let's look at it like this,
As a project that holds investors, if you say something is coming on a date, it is an expectation, asking the question is not a demand, saying he's failed to meet his own words is not a demand, outside of crypto if you were invested in a project and the developer told you something is coming on a date, you would expect this to be true, if he fails you'll want to see proof or reason as to why he has failed.
So in this scenario, he has made claims about the the release of 1.4, he's failed to meet these claims so now gunner is asking him to put up the work done to prove work is actually being done.
To give an example, if I invested in a developer who was building a block of units, he said the foundation would be set by a given date and this failed to happen due to say an issue with a builder, the investor would ask for evidence of this, and also ask for evidence of what's being done to resolve.
Without any evidence the investor would typically pull out of threaten to do so first.
How is this any different? people are investing in to this coin and he's not doing his part as the developer.
The proof is there in the screenshot, and we can see how people react to false deadlines just by looking at the price of XSPEC.
Aside from his communications with gunner, he's also told the entire community that it would be here in Feb.
Can I just give you some advice also, you care about this coin, you dislike people seeing this thread, if you're going to keep bumping it up you have to do better than this, all you're doing is giving it more visibility while being constantly beat in your comments, you are hurting the 1 thing you're trying to save
Good work gunner, keep it up mate