ok, good finds of gunner833 and preshpr1nce and quite interesting for investors (especially for very cautious, hesitant, and risk-averse investors).
jpg seems to be caught and embarrised by you because he obviously hasn't delivered enough results within that quite big time frame.
but does this really make the whole project a scam or would it even be "proof" for a scam?
i would bet you would find similar things in many coin projects if you would just dig deep enough into them.
some of them might indeed be scam projects.
but in this one i'm not sure about that.
there seems to be still a good team behind it and the technical structure of the "shadowcoin" is pretty nice and solid.
as it seems the team is trying to solve the issues and make up for the done mistakes.
i think jpg should admit his mistakes and give away a big part of the work into other hands what he obviously already does (at least partly).
although jpg might have delivered too less of programming work he could have still done some more work around it than it seems to us.
maybe he spent alot of time with researching the code and whatever else.
not all of someones work can 100% be controlled through physical results.
we cannot really tell.
and also the coin is already working well so maybe it wasn't too urgent to improve things on the technical side.
but i still agree with you guys that it was just not enough of what jpg has delivered until now.
i will hold my coins and hope that other programmers will take over the work now and in the future.
and maybe jpg will still deliver something on what he has promised.
jpg seems to be caught and embarrised by you because he obviously hasn't delivered enough results within that quite big time frame.
but does this really make the whole project a scam or would it even be "proof" for a scam?
i would bet you would find similar things in many coin projects if you would just dig deep enough into them.
some of them might indeed be scam projects.
but in this one i'm not sure about that.
there seems to be still a good team behind it and the technical structure of the "shadowcoin" is pretty nice and solid.
as it seems the team is trying to solve the issues and make up for the done mistakes.
i think jpg should admit his mistakes and give away a big part of the work into other hands what he obviously already does (at least partly).
although jpg might have delivered too less of programming work he could have still done some more work around it than it seems to us.
maybe he spent alot of time with researching the code and whatever else.
not all of someones work can 100% be controlled through physical results.
we cannot really tell.
and also the coin is already working well so maybe it wasn't too urgent to improve things on the technical side.
but i still agree with you guys that it was just not enough of what jpg has delivered until now.
i will hold my coins and hope that other programmers will take over the work now and in the future.
and maybe jpg will still deliver something on what he has promised.
In my opinion your view is balanced. Calling it a scam or not is subjective.
But we agree on something important: jbg hasn't done much work. Please explain it to the community
since they are still questioning this, which is quite obvious to anyone who looks at the github repository. Is he really working full time as he stated then? He might have done some other work, but what? From June to December there is only a week of coding work in September, what has he being doing in all this time? He only recently said that learning the code base requires time. That's true, but not 6 months with very little code changes.And I agree jbg should just list his mistakes and restart. But he hasn't done so, it's taking months for him to admit a few, which might say something about the moral of the character.