Re: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security

I have some good news everyone! It looks like Kucoin is finished integrating most of the APIs. I'm waiting for them to confirm when we'll be able to start testing deposits and withdrawals.

so much hype so little action with this project. At some point the project has to move forward. asking for donations when the lead dev goes dark and nothing is done is a joke! its too bad but one person can't make a coin successful these days. so many other better more focused projects. I'm still holding my position but not my breath!

Things do move quickly in this space; however, there's not much I can do to expedite the Kucoin listing.. I'm at the mercy of their engineers and their schedule. I made a commitment to this community to see the listing process through, as well as contribute research that will give the project a solid foundation as it begins its journey towards the top market caps. After months of stress dealing with delays, I'm relieved that the former is finally materializing.

In Game Theory, this dynamic is known as the Social Dilemma. I'm operating at the macro level, where cooperation is required with multiple parties (Kucoin, Zoidberg&Co, etc) in order to achieve a successful outcome; where as you are operating at the micro level, only concerned with the pace of cooperation and your own individual cost benefit analysis. The two inter-dependencies are natural and form a symbiotic relationship in any adaptive system. The complexity arises when trying to align the interests of the individual at the micro level with those of the parties at the macro level..

I'm in a unique position both as a contributor and a holder, so I also am able to sympathize with your perspective and concerns. However, you should know that my efforts are at a maximum pace and are only bottlenecked by cooperation from the other parties involved.

I believe that instead of being passive and waiting as a "holder" one might be inclined to initiate projects supporting Boolberry?
Even simple stuff like setting up another block explorer... More pools always welcome!

Agreed. Once a "holder" transitions into a "contributor" then the complexity between both sides starts to become clear.

A perfect example of this dynamic is the Stocks exchange vs Btcalpha scenario. On one hand you have stocks exchange with 30BTC in overall volume and a broken integration that causes loss of funds when withdrawing using payment ID. On the other hand you have BTC-Alpha with 400BTC in overall volume and a clean integration.

The most rational choice at the macro level would be for those in this community to use the latter to benefit from more access to liquidity, TradingView charts, superior trading engine and reduce the burden for contributors to deal with support issues that result from a bad integration. A successful outcome of this rationale is not easily achieved because it requires cooperation from those at the micro level.

On this level you have individual miners who keep mining directly to this exchange without regard for the concerns at the macro level because it's easier for them to continue with "business as usual" than logging into their pool and changing their payout address. The available inventory then continues to placed on the exchange with integration issues vs the one without. In order to reach a mutually beneficial solution that would decrease support tickets for contributors and increase project growth, it was most the logical choice to disable the pairing on the broken exchange until they can fix it, so that this inventory can be placed on the superior exchange.