i am brand new to this project and as so i wanted to understand about the project...so.....
i read this thread..... did get much other than they are having a airdrop...
went to their white paper and started giving it a quick skimmin and then i ran into page 15
and after reading titles only the first thing that came to a loud skkkreeccching halt was"""
Penalties
As tokenholders get reward for their participation, they could also be punished for making
wrong decisions, especially in non-skilled based disputes. As said, that job is easy, but
takes responsibility. This can be solved in 2 ways, and both should be tested:
introducing deposit voters should pay for participation in non-skilled based dispute
which they eventually can lose
reducing reward for next successful vote(s)
Also if tokenholder collects 3 negative votes, he will be permanently banned from
disputes.
Skill based disputes will definitely not include deposit and usage of it for penalty, but
reducing reward idea can influence voters to be more responsible. Also, it downgrades
voters skill points. More restrictive penalty is under consideration. Main focus here is to
discourage voters which are not sure in their potential decision, but rather gamble.
"""
did i miss something here?
how about i have nothing to do with this project and at least i wont have to undergo scrutiny of bag holders here!
Ciao Ciao