[...]
It seems to be standard to list the number of MHash as the number of total sha256(sha256(data)) operations just like you did - certainly that's what I've been doing. I get the impression this dates back to the early days of bitcoin. It's possible others haven't been doing it this way of course.
Very good. In that case and optimistically assuming that the missing interface logic can be added to makomks code, the current table looks like this:
| Chip | Rate [MHash/s] | Power [W] | Price [EUR] | Rate/Price [MHash/s/EUR] | Rate/Power [MHash/J] |
| Altera EP4CE75F23C7N | 109.29 | - | 174.47 | 0.626 | - |
| Altera EP4CE115F23C7N | 80 | 4.4 | 303.69 | 0.263 | 18.2 |
| Altera EP4CE115F23C7N | 109 | - | 303.69 | 0.359 | - |
| Xilinx XC6SLX75-3CSG484C | ? | ? | 67.29 | ? | ? |
| Xilinx XC6SLX100-3CSG484C | ? | ? | 83.86 | ? | ? |
| Xilinx XC6SLX150-3CSG484C | ? | ? | 120.47 | ? | ? |
| Xilinx XC3S500E-5CPG132C | 3.125 | 0.78 | 20.38 | 0.153 | 4 |
| Xilinx XC5VLX110-1FFG676C | 120 | - | 1126.51 | 0.107 | - |
Please fill in what is missing.