Ideally, managers that accept negative trust members should receive negative trust themselves. :/
And for what charges? Trusting the not trusted?
Trust is too vague for that.
For these charges - Giving potential scammers/account traders/alt account ring enjoy the privilages of being in this forum (which includes campaigns)
Being "potential" does not mean that it is true/accurate.
The so called "scammers/account traders/alt account" are not moderated in this forum. And AFAIK, there's no restrictions about these privileges (correct me if I am wrong here).
However a DT-red trusted member is likely an alt account/sold account/loan defaulter or simply a scammer. If they promote a project then its going to get raised eyebrows from the public who view their posts.
Perhaps.
Ideally DT-marked red trust members should not be allowed to participate. However managers should work on understanding which rating is BS and which one is valid.
I am not opposing because I am included to being a neg trusted and a campaign participant but I am just being logical here. The statement "DT-marked red trust members
should not be allowed to participate [in a campaign]" must be backed with some kind of rules. And AFAIK, there's none.