Before the "can of worms' was opened with a wallet that would let the owner chose to send none,all and any amount in between
of his stake rewards to the donation address....community donations to the devs was exactly how we did it.
It was thought this way would be smoother, more fair and take care of the devs for some time to come.
Too bad it's turned into some kind of imaginary negative for some folks.
I'm still interested how anyone could imagine a project like SpectreCoin.... that's been going since late 2016, with a large community like we have, could be anything close to a scam.
If it is....it isn't very well orchestrated....

Maybe the good people of BitCoin Talk would do better at sniffing out the real scams that bilk people out of hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars. much larger....but harder targets I guess.
Bitcointalk has lost all credibility in my honest opinion. The lowest of the low are here to inflate these forums full of useless content for the sake of sucking on any airdrop possible. Many unbacked scam accusations and misinformation about many projects that may appear legitimate to the average person. Weve become worse than mainstream media attacking other projects for our own benefit of wealth and creating multiple accounts accounts in doing so. Its almost as though there are cryptocurrency commercials following the afternoon weekday Jerry Springer show to target the unemployed and the vulnerable. Its a shame, this project has something special that not other cryptocurrency has yet to plan. As a loyal community member I wish to be more transparent and take a stand for this project as I am well aware of the legitimacy of this project that has been overshadowed by misinformation which in all fairness could be taken seriously as deadlines have not been met. It now comes down to time and belief. Stay tuned for updates.