Probably because those of us that have Bitfury rigs are busier mining than photographing - the hardware is real and has been delivered in a timely fashion. I know, I'm running some of it. I'm hoping that KNC does as good a job getting things out in a timely fashion. I have more than just a couple of Jupiters I'm waiting on.
I'm also not going to be disappointed if my Jupiters just meet the 400 Gh/s spec and at least some of them get shipped the last day in September - anything more or earlier would be considered a bonus....
Cool, but can you please upload a video for the rest of us wit respect to it's performance? This is meant to be a community here and we'd all love to see some real user evidence.
It takes moments to do, mining isn't really something that keeps you too busy to not share evidence in a community burnt so many times before.
Again I've never had a bad word to say about Bitfury, all the evidence seems to suggest he has been exemplary, there is just a lot of praise and very little I dependant visual proof.
If you could do this, that would be awesome.
It would take you 5 minutes tops with a smartphone and a clear shot of the hardware hashing against CGminer.
I just want to see definitive chip performance against true power consumption.
Please Redacted.
I just see no reason why such evidence is non-existent of he is meant to be shipping in volume, and we still cannot get a definitive answer on true power consumption at a chip level with respect to hashrate when the device exists and is actually hashing.
You can't use CGMiner or BFGMiner with Bitfury. It comes with an rPi with its own mining software.
Please go read through some of the many Bitfury threads. The evidence is there.