I guess a casino should pay half what a blackjack is worth if you bet over a certain amount also huh. Or if you bet 5.00 on red you win 10.... But if you bet 100.00 u only won 195.00
Your comparison fails. A random casino also will
send someone to break your kneecaps refuse a customer who they fear to possess a bankroll as large or larger than their own.
Plus, what's with the "principles"? Are we following the holy bible of casino morals? Hint: we're not. We should do what both interesting for players and profitable for investors. That's all.
Actually...your comparison fails.
You said it, they can refuse service. But they DO NOT change the odds. And jd can refuse service also. Lower max bet. As they did.
To change the odds is dumb and totally unfair. That's the same as me betting on a nfl game, at even money, but after my team takes a 21 point lead, the sportsbook decides that the odds are going to be -30 instead, in the middle of the game.
As for your principals comment. Really? So you advocate the site to be careless with morals? Because I'm sure THAT will make people gamble there. You shouldn't post, honestly, unless you think before talking.
You're taking it personal. Don't.
First, you're changing topics. I didn't say I'm in favor the sudden lowering of max bet, that was probably a mistake. I do however think max bet 1%, house edge 1% <50btc, 2%>=50btc is the way to go.
And you don't understand what I meant by morals. Acting immoral as in: cheating customers is simply bad business, so no sane investor wants that. But there are no "morals" that define you can't have different values for the house edge depending on bet size IMO. That's what I meant by "there are no morals".