Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining
by
zvs
on 25/09/2013, 21:51:38 UTC
i started http://nogleg.net:8372/ back up, it is connected to the nogleg.com:8372 pool.  should get maybe 0.1-0.3% more orphans or something, but maybe less DOA, depending on your connection.  it's located in Dallas, Texas.. I get 40ms ping times there,  185ms to my host in germany,  and that host gets 130ms ping times to germany.

for the last day or so it's just been running 8 thread minerd.  for the record, the xeon *e1240v3 gets about 800khash

ok, since nobody is using the dallas server except myself, going to just take it down for now so i can experiment w/ some stuff on it w/o impacting anyone's mining.

and i'm still planning on looking at 3-4 hrs worth of blocks after i reset the shares to see if anyone got screwed.  might not get around to it for another day or two though

btw, any clues as to why the pool reports incorrect local hash rate?  re:

Pool rate: 8.22MH/s (4.8% DOA+orphan) Share difficulty: 0.00486

Node uptime: 0.868 days Peers: 0 out, 1 in

Local rate: 528kH/s (2.3% DOA) Expected time to share: 0.0110 hours

...  the actual rate is the 8.22MH/s, but it just reports the 528kH/s (well, in this case since there are two pools operating, it'd be like 7mh/s on pool 1 and 1.2mh/s on pool 2... but the local rates still don't add up to the pool rate).  i installed the https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-hash-python  but that only fixes my own miner, not what the pool reports?     re: if I start mining with one of my servers, the local rate goes up a ton