I need to give a remark about the first answer.
It is a syllogism of how you presented it. It would not be the syllogism, and the way you wanted to present, if you would say:
1. Abiogenesis (The theory of evolution COULD apply (IF TRUE) as long as life exists. How that life came to exist is not relevant to evolution.)
Otherwise it is a sylogism and gives the reader wrong impression.
In other words you say - you have no idea how life originated, it could be God, and your evolution might be not true, but you want to believe it.
Actually even if God created life, evolution would still be true and it's a fact that a lot of religious people accept evolution.
Actually even if God created life, evolution COULD still be true and it's a fact that a lot of religious people accept evolution.
Here you go.
It would defile the Ockham razor and it would be irrational... but hey logically there is such a possibility, and Im open to everything, believe it or not.
Right now I would say - it is highly... terribly against the odds to have happened. But hey - people are hugely against the odds to be creationists as well. And to find two of them on the same forum is rare. So things can happen despite the odds.