As a JD Investor, lowering the max profit decreases variance. For instance betting your life savings with 51% is stupid. Betting your life savings in 100,000,000 bets, with a 1% edge, will put you ahead by a large amount, with little variance, in total gain.
You keep returning to this variance thing. What you call variance other people call luck. There is no such thing as variance, just the house edge and a nice bell shape called normal distribution.
Betting your life savings over 100,000,000 bets and betting it all on a single bet carries the exact same risk and reward. You risk less by wagering less on each bet, but if you sum up all those little "risks" across all those millions of bets you end up with the same as just making one single, large bet.
In your terms, placing many small bets means you have to be lucky and win 50,000,000 times. Placing a single bet means you only have to be lucky once.
-Michael
That is wrong on so many levels. VARIANCE by having on massive bet can even cause rare odds to occur. By making it many small bets, it is more likely to follow the predicted distribution Eg. let's say house had an edge of 90%. In one big bet, there is a 10% to lose it all (not that unlikely). If you divided it up into 100 million bets, it will come pretty damn clost to the predicted profit.