On the other hand: He should be reluctant to elaborate on the exploit since he's part of a competing business and that favors him, but that fact also makes you wonder why he still isn't playing. Reducing the max bet doesn't change strategy or eliminate the exploit ... it just causes it to take more time to bleed the house dry. Regardless if your mad the rules were changed, most people would still be playing if they could basically print money.
I think the reason he's stopped playing is because his luck ran out and he has realised he had nothing more than luck on his side.
All this FUD about the site being unfair is just that - FUD. His goal is clearly to discredit Just-Dice with a view to gaining traffic at his own pyramid scheme dice site.
If he has a strategy that works when the max bet is 300 BTC then it will also work when the max bet is 75 BTC. You just bet a quarter as much on every bet. Nothing else changed. But he doesn't have a working strategy, he has superstition, too many coins, and a disregard for their worth.
So he says he has an exploit that is different than the previous two he told me were "the exploit". So is he lying this time, or was he lying the previous two times? (That's not an exclusive 'or').
It's suspecious about lagging, not "provably fair". With the same algorithm, the game could simply ignore the previous winning result, and place another bet (win or lose, doesn't matter, equivalent to raise the house edge two folds higher), and give the player a tremendous hit, especially when betsize is large. Don't know whether I've made myself clear.
You didn't answer anything about this. YES, once again, you ignore the real question. And Yes, it's FUD.
NOT telling you the truth about exploit is not lying. You're an OP of gambling site, you should study it by youself, if you could.
Again, out of nothing, you call me lier; when I put the site profit to -5k, you called me a cheater when you knew I played by rules. As of the exploit, I repeat again,
you didn't fixed, although it'd be quite simple, you just cannot figure it out.
You only fixed me, most likely by ignoring some results of big winning bets. The result? After you fixed me, the system subsquently fixed other three dolphins within 24 hours, the site's income roared, 1000 BTC in a day. How long did JD take to recover from -2000 to 0 in the July? You experienced that: several weeks.
Even some of your investors know you're being UNFAIR to me, don't deny it.
Doog, let's do not make up reality, the change was made to protect the bankroll from the swings caused precisely by Nakowa and ONLY by Nakowa, for the simple reason he is the only one pushing max profit.
You know this post is not about the strategy (which you're so curious), it's even not about luck. This post is about you being UNFAIR.
You're distracting, please answer the real question. Or (not an exclusive or), it just doesn't matter,
players on JD should have FUD.
I've been patient along all conversations with you, and never did a single name calling. You and your supporters (I've never seen in anywhere that so many underdeveloped people gathered around other than JD chatroom, OH, among endlessly coming beggars.) constantly called me numerous times, cheater, thief, scammer, and with no proof, just with hatred. I'm tired of this.
You never know when you did something wrong, how to correctly apologize. After you left 1300 digit in my balance, when shit happened (YES, someone else lost that figure, NOW YOU KNOW WITHOUT FIXATION SPECIFICALLY TO ME, I MIGHT WELL WIN A LOT WITH THAT 1300), you never made an appropirate apology to the investors. Instead, you were enjoy people screwing me in public. And after many times you being UNFAIR to me, you never say a single "sorry" to me.
I have no further incentive to discuss with you. After all, you build your reputation in the community through a very long time, and in normal situations, you're upstanding, honest, but when tremendous pressures coming, you just cannot do things by principles.
It's not me who is discrediting Just-Dice, it's you, YOU ARE.
ME: Did you realize that'll hurt JD's reputation? (that means changing rules without warning players.)
Dooglus: no, I didn't. I acted without thinking it through, and too quickly.
Think it through, Doog, you're supposed to be a nice guy. I think the conversation is
OVER.