You don't have to sign a ToS for it to be active. Using the service means that you agree with the ToS. Damn, how can someone be so ignorant as you?
You spammed with a bot to get BTC and now TF wants it back. Sounds legit and logical to me.
My 2 cents.
So your world works like this: a faucet gives you money for watching an ad. You take the money. A few months later the faucet owner finds you on bitcointalk and says: "hey I just found out that you weren't even watching the ad, you were making sandwhiches in the kitchen when the ad was playing. This is fraud and you owe me three times the amount of money that you got from my faucet." The faucet owner lowers your bitcointalk trust and calls you a spammer. This is fair and right?
A better example would be using a python script to watch the ad 10000 times with a proxy list.
You owe me half a Bitcoin, 1.5 BTC was an estimated amount (which is not that far off when looking at how much the average user owns). I have updated the risked amount to the correct sum.
This is unhelpful and outlandish. Provide some evidence as to where you get these numbers and how they are in any way relevant to a currency trade on bitcointalk. If you assert that you 'risked .5 btc on me', what were you expecting in return? Where did I agree to this?
For pairity, Ill go ahead and arbitrarily assert that I risked 1.5 btc on you when I joined bitcointalk. If you complain, I'll lower it to the 'correct sum' of .5btc.