thank You very much for taking the time and explaining the RNG problem in more depth. yes I meant the true RNG.
This results in seemingly random data, however, technically speaking, it is not truly random. and exactly this is giving me a bit of headache and I agree that randomness is a tricky topic
but knowing that so much money is involved it should be worth to check if a TRNG is the better possibility and if it is doable.
This results in seemingly random data, however, technically speaking, it is not truly random. and exactly this is giving me a bit of headache and I agree that randomness is a tricky topic
but knowing that so much money is involved it should be worth to check if a TRNG is the better possibility and if it is doable. no problem!
as for 'checking' if a trng is possible, it is not merely a question of googleing it and finding one. Sources of randomness are at the heart of cryptography, countless millions of dollars are being poured into top-tier research around it. The system JD uses is close to as good as it gets (assuming proper implementation). This is possible to the standardization of strong cryptographic protocols (and hash functions, such as SHA).
could You please explain why he cant prove to players that the site is fair? when using TRNG
i think he interpreted using a trng as a replacement for the client - server seeds, instead of just for the generation of the server seed.