I'd be cautious regarding anyone claiming to continue supporting ZClassic without hearing it from the former ZCL (current BTCP) team directly. Seems like an easy way to scam people into downloading a 'new' wallet/software that lets others steal ZCL balances, etc.

However, if I can add to this on somewhat of a tangent, it would be good if the (ZCL replacement dev team) selection process was made to be transparent. So the public can see who's submitting proposals - in fact, if the proposals were written up as public Github repos/issues/gists, that would be ideal. Keeps all parties honest - otherwise, the BTCP team can just say that 'no one submitted quality proposals' and let ZCL die. Not cool.