I'm ignoring irrelevancies.
No. You're spouting opinions about a subject you refuse to get educated on.
I live in Western Kentucky. Believe me, I'm well educated on the opinions of a good segment of society toward environmentalists. And, like them or not, Kentuckians and people of similar mindset vote; it might be wise to at least acknowledge that their opinions are what they are.
It doesn't matter how educated your on their opinions. You can't judge them unless you understand environmentalism.
That... makes no sense.
They dislike environmentalists, and I know in good detail the general reasons behind why the bulk of them do. It's not complicated.
Actually, it is complicated. Let's pretend you know
Are you high?
Do you have any inkling of the response your posts on this thread would get from the majority of folks I know? Do you understand that you're helping make their case for them? Or why?
No. I'm not high. What I'm doing is qualifying your lack of knowledge on the subject. It's so fucking lacking, all you can do is state that you have an opinion about people in a subset of the U.S. who have an opinion about something you know nothing about.
In case you didn't know, that long post I made a while back was a copy and paste of a post in reply to your own ignorance in another thread about one year ago. Your response to it one year ago? It was, and I quote verbatim:
That was longer than expected. And I think in presenting all that, you've brought up another issue (not really related to ecology even) that makes this whole thing even messier.
I'll be fair and give your post a full reading, even though my response won't touch on most of it. I'll post the response in due time.
And you never did touch on the post in due time. You chose to remain ignorant then, and now.