Doog, let me ask you a question just made to you on the chat and that peaked my interest:
are you acting like the funds on the bankroll were 100% yours, or not?
I wonder that too. Normally casinos use their own money to fund their roll, and thus they protect it. In this case, your profit is in the commissions and you are actually totally divested. If that's your business model, I'm fine with it. I would just like to know if:
a) are you acting like the money in the bankroll was yours? Not 100%, but at least 50% - I make this differentiation because the "dilution" part is one of the things that is killing investors with losses.
if not:
b) what would you do if a big part of the casino's roll was yours?
No FUD intended, and no harsh feeling from me, but for me the fact you are 100% divested is very telling, and I'm very interested on your reasoned answers on the above.
Thank you for addressing our concerns, as always...