I really think a voting mechanism for investors, on-site, is needed. The final decision, as alway, is yours, but at least you can say with more certainty what the "collective decision" of investors really is.
Wise investors vote with their money.
Have you?
Nothing wrong with proposing a better system can be setup but when it becomes pressing, I think you forgot to vote with your money first.
That doesn't make much sense to me.
I just suggested to "vote with your money" (by influencing vote weight), but I guess what you're saying is: get on board with whatever is going on, or get out.
Sure, that's one way to go about it. And I wouldn't have made the voting suggestion if I wouldn't be getting closer to take out my investment. But that's not the solution I'd prefer --
I think the site needs improvement. Investors might help with that. But instead of doing it the way we do it now, whoever shouts loudest on the forum or in the chat, why not let them actually vote on an issue. Weighted by their investement (and time), like I said.