Most of the users you added haven't left too many trust (besides to you) so probably I won't find too many feedback that should be removed. That's not the issue here. Re-read OP and my previous posts to better understand the issue
I think all of the users you listed are outstanding members of the community that deserve to be DT2 members and I am happy to have played a role in decentralizing the default trust network with their inclusion. If you feel otherwise, please give a relevant example of why you feel that way. Them having left me trust is NOT a relevant reason for someone to NOT be included in the trust network, but displays your mindset fairly well.
How exactly does the inclusion of
nonnakip help the community and decentralizes the trust system? He left trust
only to you, no one else at all
Explain why you think all of them are outstanding members of the community that deserve to be DT2 members. You haven't explained that at all. They have barely left a few trust among all of them
The only thing most of them have in common is leaving few trusts and including you in that feedback
While of course leaving trust to you is not a reason to automatically exclude them it's definitely not a reason to include them either
You seem to be implying that the only criteria for being in DT2 is the number of negatives sent. I think that's wrong.
No. I'm not implying that. But of course that's a factor, among several others
If a user barely leaves any feedback at all then I do not understand why he was considered to DT2 in the first place
As mentioned previously, having people on your trust list that left you a positive rating should not necessarily be a bad thing as this is evidence you know the person well enough to trust them.
It is definitely a bad thing if they left trust
only to you and you are a DT1 member
And it is probably a bad thing if they left trust only to a few users besides you