It looks like there is circumstantial evidence the OP is crazybtrade based on the high number of received merits. Someone should research this further to see if there is more solid evidence of this.
Assume that the merit transaction leads to an A->B linkage (sender gains receiver's history). Not the other way around. After all, if users like peloso can send 50 merit to several accounts that don't have negative trust (myself included) then we can't exactly rely on this kind of circumstantial evidence to indicate a full connection.
I would not say either authoritivly links either with either. It might warrant an investigation to see if there are additional connections between the two.
With the above being said, I see little other reason for someone to send that many merits to a supposedly random low level user that for all intents and purposes has zero merit otherwise.