Correlation does not imply causation
I know that. I insist, I just want to understand why DT1 members added those users
Do you find any explanation why
nonnakip was added? You seem neutral, of course I'll really consider your possible explanation
If you really want to uncover abuse you need to dig deeper and you also need to be able to accept the outcome even if it doesn't match your preconceived notions. I'm starting to doubt that you're up to the task.
I know that too. I'm still digging deeper and help is much appreciated. Discarding everything is not helping, digging with me is
I'm open to be corrected and I'll admit if I'm wrong. But I'm not open to be discarded without arguments
philipma1957 is suspicious of me and that's perfectly fine. But he's really checked his list. Of course it's fine he keeps the users he considers must stay after his checking
I no longer believe he is abusing the trust system
OgNasty has just denied everything, even straightforward cases like nonnakip, and hasn't given any explanations about that at all
Tomatocage hasn't reacted yet. Let's see what happens
Well here goes
CrazyGuy --- is a good seller he stays
buysolar ---- is my partner in the solar array he stays he will also be doing the Canaan training with me. he stays
generalt ---- has purchased from me multiple times I meet him in person many times he stays
Kano-------- goes
I appreciate you re-checked them
I could argue that the people below could be removed but since I don't know why the op created the thread (other then the claim in the first thread)
I now need to leave these for a while.
Feedback from other users would be helpful here then. It seems you're very open to listening to them
I will get back to this thread in a bit and check the ones I bolded and left up just in case there was or is a hidden agenda by the op.
@ op I realize you don't want to get tagged and left you real forum name out and did a newbie post.
Maybe or maybe there is something else about the real you and you have agenda against me or OgNasty to anyone you listed.
I know enough to know that I left all those names removed intact because you may be trying to scrub a negative off someone and that is why I am at least suspicious since I now removed as many as I did has someone been lift from negative to positive?
What assurance do I have that my actions did not help someone today by pruning the list?
.
You also gave me more work to do as I will need to check what happened by my deletions.
Do check what happened by your deletions. Do verify what would happen if you remove more users. Do keep your exclusions if you've checked them and don't trust the feedback they've left. Do leave negative trust to those whose trust stopped being red because of your exclusions (if any). Do not trust me. I'm happy you did check your trust list, whatever the result
I don't see how I could prove I don't have a hidden agenda, even if I disclose who I am
I really appreciate you didn't take this as an attack to you (even though you're suspicious) and instead were open to check your list