So if I say DPR was an anarcho capitalist and also not a nice guy (two things that are very likely to be true), that's an insult, but calling me an authoritarian is not an insult? I think that's rather hypocritical.
Now I'll add on "disingenuous" to "authoritarian". Instead of owning up to what you said, you're now trying to obscure the issue by subtly rewriting history to change your quote into something other than what it was.
You didn't say "DPR was A and B", you said "Because DPR was A and B, we shouldn't be surprised of C".
Let's replace B with a different adjective, just to make the bigotry blindingly obvious for all the spectators:
"By the way - I'm amazed at how many people are surprised that a drug dealer with extreme
black tendencies turned out to be not a swell guy! Imagine that!"
You'd never dare say something like that in public, because that group isn't an socially acceptable target for bigotry any more, but you're more than willing to smear anarcho-capitalists the same way because you think no one will call you out on it.